it's been a hectic september--
had to get ahead on farm work
before going back to the northwest for
my first visit since the move last
december,
but that
16-day "vacation" turned into
a marathon of assisting Studio Kabuya
at smoke
farm lofi fest, setting
up a new
home base household on capitol
hill, and
3 excellent but exhausting 4Shadows
jams
got back here to maui where there
were figurative fires to put out, much
work to catch up on, plus
we had a
houseguest--amber
cortes from seattle
other than the jams i didn't do much
creatively--no time for reading, let
alone writing, but i did "discover"
my
phone's panorama feature and it's
rekindled my interest in
photography
what i like about it:
1)
with the
iphone 4s, to shoot a panoramic
photo you move the camera steadily in a
straight
line to
stitch together a long skinny
image in
real time.
panning along a
given axis
is a hit or miss process
with often surprising
results,
especially when you try to
force
glitch the system
by moving too slowly or erratically.
for example, by
tracking a subject through
space one achieves a cubist
effect--duchamp's nude
descending a staircase
becomes bikini
model fleeing into water
2)
the stylized anamorphic look with fisheye
bulge
underscores the illusory nature of photography.
panoramic pictures are
subjective; they don't pretend
to represent a
static objective reality but create a
distorted view
approximating the photographer's
perspective
with closer objects blown out of
proportion.
where single
frame photos encapsulate static moments
unambiguously, the
fractalized and recursive
stuttering
of pano
"fails" (whether
deliberate or
unintended)
remind us
that what we
assume to be
a fixed
reality is
really
just
a fluid
pastiche of
fragmentary perceptions.
3)
since i'm already late to the
panoramic party i might
as well save the most obvious
reason for last: panos
better re-create the
immersive feel of a given place.
regular photos
present a flattened and
truncated view,
capture
only a small wedge of the
360 degree pie. the
sweeping pano, being
bigger (about 10000x4500 pixels)
captures more
information and forces
the viewer
to scan
the image as opposed to
"getting it" in one
quick glance.
scroll to the bottom of this
page and
back again
to see what i mean.
happy pano'ing!
|
|
|